THOUGHT BOX: Is the Biden Ed Plan DEAD on Inception? Unless…

THOUGHT BOX: Is the Biden Education Plan DEAD on Inception Unless we Develop Generations of Academic-parenting Parents?

Before introducing the concept of academic-parenting, we want to go on the record. Based on decades of documentation, we support preschool expansion because evidence shows the necessity for it. And would support two additional years of high school because evidence shows a need for it as well. And we believe the presidents’ plan, “as we currently understand it,” will not create the long-term education changes this country needs without empowering and engaging parents to build a better student and support them. Is the concept perfect? No. And we are still looking for something better for parents (not the government) to do with and for their children. The only thing The Afterclap would ask of all levels of governance, is to support the concept of parents helping their children.

All data implied above and shown below was provided courtesy of elements of the United States Government. Meaning that somebody in Washington D.C. should know and understand the data indicated and shown in this post.

Academic-parenting is a concept that grew out of my early studies of how to improve the Quality of the Condition of Education at the school my youngest attended at the time. And from several surprising and unexpected admissions by fifth and sixth-grade parents challenge to help and support their child at home. By the fall of 2008, I had a solution and a descriptive name. I believed then and still do, there is a need for academic-parenting. Currently, I am functioning as an Autodidact Education Anthropologist whose primary concern is for the Quality of the Condition of Learning, not education. You will see below a tiny portion of the evidence showing the need for academic-parenting skills in the last part of this post.

In a general sense: Academic-Parenting is activities you can do with your kids to prepare them for Learning in a formal Teaching environment and support them through High school graduation. The goal is to keep it super simple. And the following academic-parenting reading exercise is an example:

1. Reading to your child before they know how to read, and then discussing what you read with them.*

2.  Reading the same book or text with them as they learn to read. Then discussing it afterward.*

3. Reading together. Not necessarily the same book or text. Or even at the same time. Then discussing what each of you read.*

* Discussing is not a lecture. It is a conversation where all parties are comfortable expressing themselves. Effective communication between you and anyone is identical to building a bridge. The longer you build on the bridge and keep it open, the stronger it becomes. But if it collapses, it is hard to rebuild. And children (bless them) may occasionally be trying. The goal is to keep them comfortable and the communication bridge open as you use your parental authority to address the situation.

I suspect many of you found the KISS reading exercise familiar. And while it is simple, it is not necessarily easy. One of the goals envisioned with the academic-parenting concept in 2008 was to become multigenerational, building on the success of the previous generation of parents by the new generation of parents. And this short description is not the whole story. When I spoke to my local school board about academic-parenting in October of 2008, I was laughed at when I opened my presentation by stating we need to engage and employ 25,000 parents in our school system. But they weren’t laughing by the time I finished. They were impressed enough with the concept to schedule another meeting to discover if the District could engage and employ 25,000 parents. Eventually, the District gave up on the idea. And while I was hopeful, I was not surprised. Today unlike then, I can show evidence there is a need.

The following section shows a tiny amount of the fact-checkable evidence from the National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP) measurements of academic scholarship.

1971 Parental Education impact on 17-year-old student acquisition of Reading Proficiency; TABLE 1: Parent Education Level and Corresponding Percentage of available Points earned by Mean or Average Score(1):

> Not a high school graduate = 52%

> Graduated high school = 57%

> Some education after high school = 60%

Mean or Average Score percentages in Table 1; are the equivalent of a classroom grade and a letter grade of an “F” if the minimum classroom proficiency threshold were a 70 or better.

1978 Parental Education impact on 17-year-old students learning of Mathematics Proficiency; TABLE 2: Parent Education Level and Corresponding Percentage of available Points earned by Mean or Average Score(2):

> Not a high school graduate = 56%

> Graduated high school = 49%

> Some education after high school = 61%

> Graduated college = 63%

Mean or Average Score percentages in Table 2; are the equivalent of a classroom grade and a letter grade of an “F” if the minimum classroom proficiency threshold were a 70 or better.

I am skipping past more than Forty-one years of additional evidence to 2019.

2019 Parental Education impact on 12th-Grade student acquisition of Reading Proficiency; TABLE 3: Parent Education Level and Corresponding Percentage of available Points earned by Mean or Average Score(3):

> Did not finish high school = 54%

> Graduated high school = 54%

> Some education after high school = 57%

> Graduated college = 59%

> Unknown = 51%

Mean or Average Score percentages in Table 3; are the equivalent of a classroom grade and a letter grade of an “F” if the minimum classroom proficiency threshold were a 70 or better.

2019 Parental Education impact on 12th-Grade student acquisition of Mathematics Proficiency; TABLE 4: Parent Education Level and Corresponding Percentage of available Points earned by Mean or Average Score(4):

> Did not finish high school = 44%

> Graduated high school = 45%

> Some education after high school = 49%

> Graduated college = 54%

> Unknown = 42%

Mean or Average Score percentages in Table 4; are the equivalent of a classroom grade and a letter grade of an “F” if the minimum classroom proficiency threshold were a 70 or better.

What you have seen is the impact of the parental educational level of students near or during their last year in high school. This post is a quick snapshot of the beginning and latest results of a 41 year-plus window of data and does not include 13-year-old and 8th-grade results.

Parental Education Impact: is a sensitive issue for more than the two reasons shown here:

One, I have yet to hear or read an open discussion of the impact of adult knowledge on their kid(s).

Two, some people focus feed and foster the public narrative around economics while ignoring or unaware of the impact of parents’ education level.

The failure to bring this information to the public forum is detrimental to improving the Quality of the Condition of Learning.

If you have made the mistake of presuming, I am stating we haven’t made some improvements. We have! One example, we don’t institutionalize children diagnosed on the Autistic Spectrum as much anymore. In 1999 a member of the medical profession suggested my wife and I place our youngest in an institution. We lost my wife to complications from cancer in 2004. And I have been a single parent since. As for our youngest, he will receive his master’s degree in history later this month. There was no Individualized Education Plan (IEP) or 504 plan for students when I was in school. And if you look at the 1971 or 1978 “Graduated from high school” results, I was below that average during the birth through high school graduation years. Yet, I was promoted every year on time. I did not know of a term describing what happened to me until then, governor of Texas George Washington Bush started talking about “No Child Left Behind” in 1999. I did not become a student until after I was 21-years old. Before that, I was in survival mode. And if you ever felt lost when you could not help your child with their homework as a parent, I know how you felt. Forty-eight years later, I am not that 21-year-old. I have worked at making up for the lost opportunities at Learning.

METHODOLOGY:

At, The Afterclap we translate large-scale Standardized Test measurement systems through a process named “Calculating the Percent of a Perfect Score.” This KISS (keep it super simple) method converts results to a percentage and equivalent classroom grade. This translation eliminates the need for an education authority to tell you what they want you to believe. Or provide an explanation you may not understand. The process was created by a Founder of The Afterclap. He spent nine years serving on Public School Councils with a Georgia legislated expectation to make positive suggestions to improve the Quality of the Condition of Education in the school he served. And be able to explain how well students performed on large-scale standardized assessments to parents and interested stakeholders. As a parent, he understands the implications of the Classroom Grade and suspects you do as well. If your child brings home a grade of 57, the score eliminates some questions and opens the door to specific targeted questions from “what did you learn today?” To, “what have you not learned yet?”

Bruce Kendall, Founder

We Translate Standardized Test results for Stakeholders because we care enough to do what nobody else does. Make the results understandable.

Web: https://theafterclap.com/

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/The-Afterclap-107153424017370

Twitter: https://twitter.com/@TAfterclap

SOURCES:

(1) 1995 > Digest of Education Statistics > National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Long Term Trends. > “Table 105. Average student proficiency in reading, by age and selected characteristics of students: 1971 to 1992.”> Where the earliest year listed for Parental education impact on 17-year-olds in “Reading Proficiency” was 1971. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d95/dtab105.asp

(2) 1999 > Digest of Education Statistics > National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Long Term Trends. > “Table 123. Average mathematics proficiency, by age and by selected characteristics of students: 1973 to 1996.” Where the earliest year listed for Parental education impact on 17-year-olds in “Mathematics Proficiency” was 1978 https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d99/d99t123.asp

(3) 2019 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Reading, Grade 12, Parental education level, from 2 questions [PARED] and National jurisdiction. https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/ndecore/landing

(4) 2019 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Mathematics, Grade 12, Parental education level, from 2 questions [PARED] and National jurisdiction. https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/ndecore/landing

Drinking the Kool-Aide and Thinking

It’s after 1:00 pm in my time zone, and I am preparing breakfast.

My sleep and woke cycles have shifted again.

While I was drinking the kool-aide this morning during breakfast preparations, I wondered if there was a fount of knowledge to be found on social media.

And what is it with this negativity business about drinking the kool-aide.

I like cool-aide. I especially like mixing grape and apple-flavored kool-aide.

So let me ask you an important question. Just for my edification.

Especially since we have all been in the current medical pandemic together:

Do you think it’s too early to start singing Christmas songs?

Or am I being too hopeful?

What do you think?

Not sure. Ask your friends and neighbors. We are all in this together whether we want to be or not.

Peace. Be Well. And do Good!

2019 Georgia Milestones Elementary Scores as Grades revised to include students left behind

“Because The Georgia Milestones was not administered during the 2019-2020 school year, The Afterclap will re-post previous posts with newly available datum and revise and update where applicable. Additionally, we will start posting past years of Milestones datum.”

2019 Georgia Milestones Elementary Scaled Scores as Classroom Grade equivalents revised to include students left behind.

2019 was another season of failed expectations for Georgia’s students, as they progress from Birth to High school Graduation, where more than 80 percent failed to achieve a benchmark grade of 70 or better on Georgia’s Milestones Assessments of Elementary students. For the approximately 7 to 16 percent of students across domains meeting or exceeding the 70 benchmarks, Congratulations.

In this post, the 2019 Milestones mean scaled scores were translated to a percent of a perfect score and rounded to two decimal places. The result is an equivalent classroom grade on a scale of 0 to 100. Learning levels (1) Beginning Learner, (2) Developing Learner, (3) Proficient Learner, and (4) Distinguished Learner ranges are rounded to one decimal place. All datum is stated as its classroom equivalent grades. Percentages of students may not total 100 percent due to the Georgia Department of Education rounding.

 

Third Grade Mathematics

In 2019, One hundred twenty-nine thousand one hundred fifty-six students representing the future graduating class of 2028; were assessed. Their Mean Grade was a 56.63. Their Distribution of Grades across the four learning levels:

(1) Beginning Learner range, 18 percent earned grades ranging from 0.0 to 44.3

(2) Developing Learner, 31 percent earned grades ranging from 44.6 to 56.4

(3) Proficient Learner, 39 percent earned grades ranging from 56.6 to 69.6

(4) Distinguished Learner, 13 percent earned grades ranging from 69.9 to 100

Approximately 88 percent-plus of Third Grade students were left behind in Mathematics.

 

Third Grade English Language Arts

In 2019, One hundred twenty-nine thousand two hundred thirty-one students representing the future graduating class of 2028; were assessed. Their Mean Grade was a 50.92. Their Distribution of Grades across the four learning levels:

(1) Beginning Learner range, 29 percent earned grades ranging from 0.0 to 45.2

(2) Developing Learner, 29 percent earned grades ranging from 45.4 to 52.9

(3) Proficient Learner, 28 percent earned grades ranging from 53.1 to 61.5

(4) Distinguished Learner, 14 percent earned grades ranging from 61.7 to 100

Approximately 86 percent-plus of Third Grade students were left behind in English Language Arts.

 

Third Grade Reading status

Of the 129,231 students assessed, the Georgia Department of Education (GA DOE) reported 27 percent below grade level and 73 percent at or above grade level.

So how is it possible that 73 percent of the students were reading at or above grade level when less than 14 percent of the Grades earned were above a 70?

 

Fourth Grade Mathematics

In 2019, One hundred thirty-three thousand four hundred eighty-six students representing the future graduating class of 2027; were assessed. Their Mean Grade was a 57.30. Their Distribution of Grades across the four learning levels:

(1) Beginning Learner range, 18 percent earned grades ranging from 0 to 45.8

(2) Developing Learner, 33 percent earned grades ranging from 46.1 to 57.1

(3) Proficient Learner, 36 percent earned grades ranging from 57.3 to 70.6

(4) Distinguished Learner, 14 percent earned grades ranging from 70.8 to 100

Approximately 87 percent of Forth Grade students were left behind in Mathematics.

 

Fourth Grade English Language Arts

In 2019, One hundred thirty-three thousand five hundred forty-seven students representing the future graduating class of 2027; were assessed. Their Mean Grade was a 55.80. Their Distribution of Grades across the four learning levels:

(1) Beginning Learner range, 25 percent earned grades ranging from 0 to 46.7

(2) Developing Learner, 32 percent earned grades ranging from 46.9 to 55.6

(3) Proficient Learner, 27 percent earned grades ranging from 55.8 to 64.2

(4) Distinguished Learner, 16 percent earned grades ranging from 64.4 to 100

Approximately 84 percent-plus of Fourth Grade students were left behind in English Language Arts.

 

Fourth Grade Reading status

In 2019, Of the 133,547 students assessed, the GA DOE reported 36 percent below grade level and 64 percent at or above grade level.

So how is it possible that 64 percent of the students were reading at or above grade level when less than 16 percent of the Grades earned were above a 70?

 

Fifth Grade Mathematics

In 2019, One hundred thirty-six thousand four hundred fifty-eight students representing the future graduating class of 2026; were assessed. Their Mean Grade was a 55.78. Their Distribution of Grades across the four learning levels:

(1) Beginning Learner range, 24 percent earned grades ranging from 0 to 45.4

(2) Developing Learner, 35 percent earned grades ranging from 45.7 to 56.3

(3) Proficient Learner, 27 percent earned grades ranging from 56.5 to 68.3

(4) Distinguished Learner, 13 percent earned grades ranging from 68.5 to 100

Approximately 86 percent-plus of Fifth Grade students were left behind in Mathematics.

 

Fifth Grade English Language Arts

In 2019, One hundred thirty-six thousand five hundred thirteen students representing the future graduating class of 2026; were assessed. Their Mean Grade was a 55.81. Their Distribution of Grades across the four learning levels:

(1) Beginning Learner range, 24 percent earned grades ranging from 0 to 48.0

(2) Developing Learner, 31 percent earned grades ranging from 48.2 to 57.1

(3) Proficient Learner, 34 percent earned grades ranging from 57.3 to 68.4

(4) Distinguished Learner, 11 percent earned grades ranging from 68.5 to 100

Approximately 89 percent-plus of Fifth Grade students were left behind in English Language Arts.

 

Fifth Grade Reading status

Of the 136,513 students assessed, the GA DOE reported 27 percent below grade level and 73 percent at or above grade level.

So how is it possible that 73 percent of the students were reading at or above grade level when less than 11 percent of the Grades earned were above a 70?

 

Fifth Grade Social Studies

In 2019, One hundred thirty-six thousand two hundred seven students representing the future graduating class of 2026; were assessed. Their Mean Grade was a 57.87. Their Distribution of Grades across the four learning levels:

(1) Beginning Learner range, 22 percent earned grades ranging from 0 to 49.1

(2) Developing Learner, 47 percent earned Grades ranging from 49.3 to 62.4

(3) Proficient Learner, 19 percent earned grades ranging from 62.7 to 70.4

(4) Distinguished Learner, 11 percent earned grades ranging from 70.7 to 100

Approximately 88 percent of Fifth Grade students were left behind in Social Studies.

 

Fifth Grade Science

In 2019, One hundred thirty-six thousand two hundred seven students representing the future graduating class of 2026; were assessed. Their Mean Grade was a 57.09. Their Distribution of Grades across the four learning levels:

(1) Beginning Learner range, 30 percent earned grades ranging from 0 to 50.6

(2) Developing Learner, 27 percent earned grades ranging from 50.8 to 58.7

(3) Proficient Learner, 30 percent earned grades ranging from 58.9 to 70.0

(4) Distinguished Learner, 13 percent earned grades ranging from 70.2 to 100

Approximately 87 percent of Fifth Grade students were left behind in Social Studies.

 

The obligatory self-promotion:

As a startup, we are hoping you will find The Afterclap informative, different, and engaging. If you do, we would appreciate your following and sharing.

We are a work in progress, and our first goal is to show assessment results in an obvious, understandable, relatable way. We believe if the results were; evident, understandable, and relatable. Educational Authorities would not need to explain them to their satisfaction. Or for you to need The Afterclap to translate the Education Authorities imagineered scaled scores.

We welcome questions about the work and suggestions pertinent to accomplishing our goal.

 

You can find The Afterclap at:

Blog

Facebook

Or when we Twitter @TAfterclap

 

SOURCES USED:

[https://www.gadoe.org/External-Affairs-and-Policy/communications/Documents/Spring%202019%20EOG%20-%20State%20Level%20-%20All%20Grades.xlsx]

Georgia Milestones Assessment System End-of-Grade (EOG) Interpretive Guide for Score Reports for Spring and Summer 2019 For Use with Score Reports from Spring and Summer 2019 Administrations.Pdf

Georgia’s 2019 NAEP, Part V: Eighth Grade Reading, Ethnic and Gender, Grades and Gaps

Students identified as Asians as part of a group, and as a single group has led the nation in Reading on the National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP) results since 2009. In 2019 notwithstanding their level of academic leadership, more than 85 percent of Georgia Eighth-Grade Asian students were left behind in Reading.

This post is Part Five of five posts addressing the Georgia 2019 NAEP assessments. Use the following links for Part One The Corrected and Upgraded Edition, Part Two, Part Three, and Part Four.

Conventions used throughout the post:

Ethnic groups and genders are listed by demonstrated NAEP academic performance results, from the highest to the lowest-achieving group.

All reported NAEP scaled scores are mathematically converted to their 0-to-100 scale conventional classroom equivalents using a process described as calculating the Percent of a Perfect Score (PPS) and referred to as Grades. All Grades rounded to the nearest whole number. All performance level descriptors (grades) are adjusted to whole numbers to show partition. Percentages are rounded to the nearest whole number and may not equal 100 percent due to rounding.

 

Georgia’s 2019 Eighth Grade Reading by Race/Ethnicity and Gender using 2011 guidelines, as school-reported

Georgia Students Identified as Asian

 Average Reading Grades:

  • Georgia, 57
  • National, 57

Percentage by Performance Level:

  • Below Basic (0 to 48) Grades, 12 percent
  • Basic (49 to 56) Grades, 30 percent
  • Proficient (57 to 64) Grades, 44 percent
  • Advanced (65 to 100) Grades, 15 percent

Average Grade by Percentile:

  • The tenth, 48
  • The twenty-fifth, 53
  • The fiftieth, 58
  • The seventy-fifth, 62
  • The ninetieth, 66

 Summary: more than 85 percent of Georgia’s Eighth Grade Students identified as Asian left behind in Reading.

 

Georgia Students Identified as Two or more races

Average Reading Grades:

  • Georgia, 55
  • National, 55

Percentage by Performance Level:

  • Below Basic (0 to 48) Grades, 14 percent
  • Basic (49 to 56) Grades, 37 percent
  • Proficient (57 to 64) Grades, 43 percent
  • Advanced (65 to 100) Grades, 6 percent

 Average Grade by Percentile:

  • The tenth, 47
  • The twenty-fifth, 52
  • The fiftieth, 56
  • The seventy-fifth, 60
  • The ninetieth, 63

Summary: More than 94 percent of Georgia’s Eighth Grade Students identified as Two or more races left behind in Reading.

 

Georgia Students Identified as White

Average Reading Grades:

  • Georgia, 54
  • National, 54

Percentage by Performance Level:

  • Below Basic (0 to 48) Grades, 18 percent
  • Basic (49 to 56) Grades, 38 percent
  • Proficient (57 to 64) Grades, 38 percent
  • Advanced (65 to 100) Grades, 5 percent

Average Grade by Percentile:

  • The tenth, 45
  • The twenty-fifth, 50
  • The fiftieth, 55
  • The seventy-fifth, 59
  • The ninetieth, 62

Summary: more than 95 percent of Georgia’s Eighth Grade Students identified as White left behind in Reading.

 

Georgia Students Identified as Female

Average Reading Grades:

  • Georgia, 54
  • National, 53

Percentage by Performance Level:

  • Below Basic (0 to 48) Grades, 22 percent
  • Basic (49 to 56) Grades, 39 percent
  • Proficient (57 to 64) Grades, 34 percent
  • Advanced (65 to 100) Grades, 5 percent

Average Grade by Percentile:

  • The tenth, 45
  • The twenty-fifth, 49
  • The fiftieth, 54
  • The seventy-fifth, 59
  • The ninetieth, 62

Summary: more than 95 percent of Georgia Eighth Grade Students identified as Female left behind in Reading.

 

Georgia Students Identified as Male

Average Reading Grades:

  • Georgia, 51
  • National, 52

 Percentage by Performance Level:

  • Below Basic (0 to 48) Grades, 34 percent
  • Basic (49 to 56) Grades, 40 percent
  • Proficient (57 to 64) Grades, 24 percent
  • Advanced (65 to 100) Grades, 2 percent

Average Grade by Percentile:

  • The tenth, 41
  • The twenty-fifth, 46
  • The fiftieth, 52
  • The seventy-fifth, 56
  • The ninetieth, 60

Summary: more than 97 percent of Georgia Eighth Grade Students identified as left Male behind in Reading.

 

Georgia Students Identified as Hispanic

Average Reading Grades:

  • Georgia, 51
  • National, 50

Percentage by Performance Level:

  • Below Basic (0 to 48) Grades, 33 percent
  • Basic (49 to 56) Grades, 42 percent
  • Proficient (57 to 64) Grades, 24 percent
  • Advanced (65 to 100) Grades, 2 percent

Average Grade by Percentile:

  • The tenth, 41
  • The twenty-fifth, 47
  • The fiftieth, 52
  • The seventy-fifth, 56
  • The ninetieth, 60

Summary: more than 98 percent of Georgia’s Eighth Grade Students identified as Hispanic left behind in Reading.

 

Georgia Students Identified as Black

Average Reading Grades:

  • Georgia, 50
  • National, 49

Percentage by Performance Level:

  • Below Basic (0 to 48) Grades, 41 percent
  • Basic (49 to 56) Grades, 41 percent
  • Proficient (57 to 64) Grades, 17 percent
  • Advanced (65 to 100) Grades, 1 percent

Average Grade by Percentile:

  • The tenth, 41
  • The twenty-fifth, 45
  • The fiftieth, 50
  • The seventy-fifth, 55
  • The ninetieth, 58

Summary; more than 98 percent of Georgia Eighth Grade Students identified as Black left behind in Reading.

 

TABLE 1: Georgia Eighth Grade Reading Gaps by Identified Ethnicity and Gender. In Descending Order and Difference.

Students Identified as GRADE GAP Difference from Asian Students
Asian 57  
Two or more races 55 2
White 54 3
Female 54 3
National All students 53 4
Georgia All students 52 5
Hispanic 51 6
Male 51 6
Black 50 7*

* Table 1: shows the NAEP difference between Asian and Black student results when viewed as PPS equivalent traditional grade values as 7 points.

The obligatory self-promotion:

As a startup (with a five-month break), we are hoping you will find The Afterclap informative, different, and engaging. If you do, we would appreciate your following and sharing.

We are a work in progress, and our first goal is to show assessment results in a self-evident, understandable, and relatable format.

As a work in progress, if having read any of our previous posts, you will see how we are evolving and changing the format of the posts, by streamlining the presentation. The goal is to show more facts in less space because your time is valuable. And we appreciate your time spent at The Afterclap.

As always, we welcome questions about the work and suggestions pertinent to accomplishing our goal.

You can find The Afterclap at:

Blog

Facebook

Or when we Twitter @TAfterclap

METHODOLOGY

All NAEP scaled scores are calculated as a percent of a perfect score (equivalent to grades on the zero-to-100 scale) and rounded to the nearest whole number. Example: a 246.28 NAEP scale score reported as a 246 calculated as a percent of a perfect score is a 49. Except for NAEP scale scores showing exit and entry points between proficiency levels, which are adjusted up or down to the nearest whole number delineating performance levels. Due to the rounding of published NAEP scaled scores, the estimated margin of error is a possible plus or minus two NAEP scale points. As a percent of a perfect score, the estimated margin of error is less than one-half of a grade point difference.

LINKS AND LIST OF TABLES USED:

Part 1: https://theafterclap.com/2019/11/02/georgias-2019-naep-performance-as-grades-part-1-01-the-corrected-and-upgraded-edition/

Part 2: https://theafterclap.com/2019/11/22/georgias-2019-naep-ethnic-and-gender-fourth-grade-math-performance-as-grades-part-2/

Part 3: https://theafterclap.com/2019/12/03/georgias-2019-naep-ethnic-and-gender-eighth-grade-math-performance-as-grades-part-3/

Part 4: https://theafterclap.com/2020/05/06/georgias-2019-naep-part-iv-fourth-grade-reading-ethnic-and-gender-grades-and-gaps/

NAEP Data Explorer Reports https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/ndecore/xplore/NDE:

> Average scale scores and percentages at each achievement level for grade 8 reading, by race/ethnicity using 2011 guidelines, school-reported [SRACE10] and jurisdiction: 2019

> Average scale scores and percentages at each achievement level for grade 8 reading, by all students [TOTAL] and jurisdiction: 2019

> Average scale scores and percentages at each achievement level for grade 8 reading, by Gender [GENDER] and jurisdiction: 2019

> Average scale scores and percentile scores for grade 8 reading, by race/ethnicity using 2011 guidelines, school-reported [SRACE10] and jurisdiction: 2019

> Average scale scores and percentile scores for grade 8 reading, by Gender [GENDER] and jurisdiction: 2019

> Average scale scores and percentile scores for grade 8 reading, by all students [TOTAL] and jurisdiction: 2019

 

Georgia’s 2019 NAEP, Part IV: Fourth Grade Reading, Ethnic and Gender, Grades and Gaps

Students identified as Asians as part of a group, and as a single group has led the nation in Reading on the National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP) results since 2007. In 2019 notwithstanding their level of academic leadership, more than 71 percent of Georgia Fourth-Grade Asian students were left behind in Reading.

This post is Part Four of five posts addressing the Georgia 2019 NAEP assessments. Use the following links for Part One The Corrected and Upgraded Edition, Part Two, and Part Three.

Conventions used throughout the post:

Ethnic groups and genders are listed by demonstrated NAEP academic performance results, from the highest to the lowest-achieving group.

All reported NAEP scaled scores are mathematically converted to their 0-to-100 scale conventional classroom equivalents using a process described as calculating the Percent of a Perfect Score (PPS) and referred to as Grades. All Grades rounded to the nearest whole number. All performance level descriptors (grades) are adjusted to whole numbers to show partition. Percentages are rounded to the nearest whole number and may not equal 100 percent due to rounding.

Georgia 2019 Fourth Grade Reading Grades by Race/Ethnicity and Gender using 2011 guidelines, as school-reported

 

Georgia Students Identified as Asian

Average Reading Grades:

  • Georgia, 49
  • National, 48

Percentage by Performance Levels:

  • Below Basic (0 to 41) Grades, 13 percent
  • Basic (42 to 47) Grades, 25 percent
  • Proficient (48 to 53) Grades, 33 percent
  • Advanced (54 to 100) Grades, 29 percent

Average Grade by Percentile:

  • The Tenth, 40
  • The Twenty-fifth, 45
  • The Fiftieth, 50
  • The Seventy-fifth, 55
  • The Ninetieth, 58

Summary; more than 71 percent of Georgia Fourth Grade Students Identified as Asian, left behind in Reading.

 

Georgia Students Identified as White

Average Reading Grades:

  • Georgia, 46
  • National, 46

Percentage by Performance Levels:

  • Below Basic (0 to 41) Grades, 23 percent
  • Basic (42 to 47) Grades, 29 percent
  • Proficient (48 to 53) Grades, 33 percent
  • Advanced (54 to 100) Grades, 15 percent

Average Grade by Percentile:

  • The tenth, 36
  • The twenty-fifth, 42
  • The fiftieth, 47
  • The seventy-fifth, 51
  • The ninetieth, 55

Summary; more than 85 percent of Georgia Fourth Grade Students Identified as White, left behind in Reading.

 

Georgia Students Identified as Two or More Races

Average Reading Grades:

  • Georgia, 45
  • National, 45

Percentage by Performance Levels:

  • Below Basic (0 to 41) Grades, 28 percent
  • Basic (42 to 47) Grades, 35 percent
  • Proficient (48 to 53) Grades, 27 percent
  • Advanced (54 to 100) Grades, 10 percent

Average Grade by Percentile:

  • The tenth, 35
  • The twenty-fifth, 41
  • The fiftieth, 46
  • The seventy-fifth, 49
  • The ninetieth, 54

Summary; more than 90 percent of Georgia Fourth Grade Students Identified as Two or More Races, left behind in Reading.

 

Georgia Students Identified as Female

Average Reading Grades:

  • Georgia, 44
  • National, 45

Percentage by Performance Levels:

  • Below Basic (0 to 41) Grades, 33 percent
  • Basic (42 to 47) Grades, 32 percent
  • Proficient (48 to 53) Grades, 24 percent
  • Advanced (54 to 100) Grades, 10 percent

Average Grade by Percentile:

  • The tenth, 34
  • The twenty-fifth, 39
  • The fiftieth, 45
  • The seventy-fifth, 50
  • The ninetieth, 54

Summary; more than 89 percent of Georgia Students Identified as Female, left behind in Reading.

 

Georgia Students Identified as Male

Average Reading Grades:

  • Georgia, 43
  • National, 43

Percentage by Performance Levels:

  • Below Basic (0 to 41) Grades, 40 percent
  • Basic (42 to 47) Grades, 31 percent
  • Proficient (48 to 53) Grades, 22 percent
  • Advanced (54 to 100) Grades, 8 percent

Average Grade by Percentile:

  • The tenth, 32
  • The twenty-fifth, 38
  • The fiftieth, 44
  • The seventy-fifth, 49
  • The ninetieth, 53

Summary; more than 92 percent of Georgia Students Identified as Male, left behind in Reading.

 

Georgia Students Identified as Hispanic

Average Reading Grades:

  • Georgia, 42
  • National, 42

Percentage by Performance Levels:

  • Below Basic (0 to 41) Grades, 44 percent
  • Basic (42 to 47) Grades, 33 percent
  • Proficient (48 to 53) Grades, 18 percent
  • Advanced (54 to 100) Grades, 4 percent

Average Grade by Percentile:

  • The tenth, 31
  • The twenty-fifth, 37
  • The fiftieth, 43
  • The seventy-fifth, 47
  • The ninetieth, 51

Summary; more than 95 percent of Georgia Students Identified as Hispanic, left behind in Reading.

 

Georgia Students Identified as Black

Average Reading Grades:

  • Georgia, 41
  • National, 41

Percentage by Performance Levels:

  • Below Basic (0 to 41) Grades, 50 percent
  • Basic (42 to 47) Grades, 33 percent
  • Proficient (48 to 53) Grades, 14 percent
  • Advanced (54 to 100) Grades, 3 percent

Average Grade by Percentile:

  • The tenth, 31
  • The twenty-fifth, 36
  • The fiftieth, 42
  • The seventy-fifth, 46
  • The ninetieth, 50

 Summary; more than 97 percent of Georgia Students Identified as Black, left behind in Reading.

 

TABLE 1: Georgia Fourth Grade Reading Gaps by Identified Ethnicity and Gender. In Descending Order and Difference.

Students Identified as GRADE GAP Difference from Asian Students
Asian 49 from
White 46 3
Two or more races 45 4
Female 44 5
National All students 44 5
GA All students 44 5
Male 43 6
Hispanic 42 7
Black 41 8 *

* Table 1: shows the NAEP difference between Asian and Black student results when viewed as PPS equivalent traditional grade values as 8 points.

The obligatory self-promotion:

As a startup (with a five-month break), we are hoping you will find The Afterclap informative, different, and engaging. If you do, we would appreciate your following and sharing.

We are a work in progress, and our first goal is to show assessment results in a self-evident, understandable, and relatable way. If Educational Authorities chose to report them in a self-evident, understandable, and relatable way, you would not need The Afterclap to translate them.

As a work in progress, if you have read any of our previous posts, you will see how we are evolving and changing the format of the posts, by streamlining the presentation. The goal is to show more facts in less space because your time is valuable. And we appreciate your time spent at The Afterclap.

As always, we welcome questions about the work and suggestions pertinent to accomplishing our goal.

You can find The Afterclap at:

Blog

Facebook

Or when we Twitter @TAfterclap

METHODOLOGY

All NAEP scaled scores are calculated as a percent of a perfect score (equivalent to grades on the zero-to-100 scale) and rounded to the nearest whole number. Example: a 246.28 NAEP scale score reported as a 246 calculated as a percent of a perfect score is a 49. Except for NAEP scale scores showing exit and entry points between proficiency levels, which are adjusted up or down to a whole number delineating performance levels. Due to the rounding of NAEP published scaled scores, the estimated margin of error is a possible plus or minus two NAEP scale points. As a percent of a perfect score, the estimated margin of error is less than one-half of a grade point difference.

LINKS AND LIST OF TABLES USED:

Part 1: https://theafterclap.com/2019/11/02/georgias-2019-naep-performance-as-grades-part-1-01-the-corrected-and-upgraded-edition/

Part 2: https://theafterclap.com/2019/11/22/georgias-2019-naep-ethnic-and-gender-fourth-grade-math-performance-as-grades-part-2/

Part 3: https://theafterclap.com/2019/12/03/georgias-2019-naep-ethnic-and-gender-eighth-grade-math-performance-as-grades-part-3/

NAEP Data Explorer Reports https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/ndecore/xplore/NDE:

> Average scale scores and percentages at each achievement level for grade 4 reading, by race/ethnicity using 2011 guidelines, school-reported [SRACE10] and jurisdiction: 2019

> Average scale scores and percentages at each achievement level for grade 4 reading, by all students [TOTAL] and jurisdiction: 2019

> Average scale scores and percentages at each achievement level for grade 4 reading, by Gender [GENDER] and jurisdiction: 2019

> Average scale scores and percentile scores for grade 4 reading, by race/ethnicity using 2011 guidelines, school-reported [SRACE10] and jurisdiction: 2019

> Average scale scores and percentile scores for grade 4 reading, by Gender [GENDER] and jurisdiction: 2019

> Average scale scores and percentile scores for grade 4 reading, by all students [TOTAL] and jurisdiction: 2019

Georgia’s 2019 NAEP Ethnic and Gender Eighth Grade Math Performance as Grades Part 3

Ethnic groups are listed by academic performance as measured by the National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP). Students identified as Asians have led the assessment results for most of the current century. In 2019 it is estimated that 56% plus of Georgia’s Asian students were left behind, based on NAEP’s academic expectations.

This post is part three of five posts addressing Georgia’s 2019 NAEP assessments, follow links for Part One The Corrected and Upgraded Edition, and Part Two.

Georgia’s average Student Grade in Eighth Grade Math was a 56.

 

Eighth Grade Mathematics by Race/Ethnicity using 2011 guidelines, as school-reported; and Gender

Asian Students 2019 Eighth Grade Mathematics

Georgia’s average Asian Student Grade was a 65

The National average Asian Student Grade was a 63

Percent of Georgia’s Asian students scoring:

  • Below Basic with Grades of 0 to 52, was 7 percent
  • At Basic with Grades of 53 to 60, was 16 percent
  • At Proficient with Grades of 61 to 66, was 33 percent
  • At Advanced with Grades of 67 to 100, was 44 percent

Average Grade for Georgia’s Asian Students scoring in:

  • The tenth percentile was a 55
  • The twenty-fifth percentile was a 60
  • The fiftieth percentile was a 65
  • The seventy-fifth percentile was a 71
  • The ninetieth percentile Grade was a 75

The assessment shows an estimated 56% plus of Georgia’s Asian students were left behind academically based on NAEP’s Eighth Grade Mathematics assessment expectations for eighth-grade students.

 

White Students 2019 Eighth Grade Mathematics

Georgia’s average White Student Grade was a 58

The National average White Student Grade was a 58

Percent of Georgia’s White students scoring:

  • Below Basic with Grades of 0 to 52, was 21 percent
  • At Basic with Grades of 53 to 60, was 36 percent
  • At Proficient with Grades of 61 to 66, was 30 percent
  • At Advanced with Grades of 67 to 100, was 13 percent

Average Grade for Georgia’s White Students scoring in:

  • The tenth percentile was a 49
  • The twenty-fifth percentile was a 54
  • The fiftieth percentile was a 59
  • The seventy-fifth percentile was a 63
  • The ninetieth percentile Grade was a 68

The assessment shows an estimated 87% plus of Georgia’s White students were left behind academically based on NAEP’s Eighth Grade Mathematics assessment expectations for eighth-grade students.

 

Two or more Races Students 2019 Eighth Grade Mathematics

Georgia’s average for students identifying as two or more Races Grade was a 57

The National average for students identifying as two or more Races Grade was a 57

Percent of Georgia’s students identifying as Two or More Races scoring:

  • Below Basic with Grades of 0 to 52, was 26 percent
  • At Basic with Grades of 53 to 60, was 39 percent
  • At Proficient with Grades of 61 to 66, was 28 percent
  • At Advanced with Grades of 67 to 100, was 6 percent

Average Grade for Georgia’s Students identifying as Two or More Races scoring in:

  • The tenth percentile was a 48
  • The twenty-fifth percentile was a 52
  • The fiftieth percentile was a 57
  • The seventy-fifth percentile was a 61
  • The ninetieth percentile Grade was a 65

The assessment shows an estimated 94% plus of Georgia’s students identifying as two or more Races were left behind academically based on NAEP’s Eighth Grade Mathematics assessment expectations for eighth-grade students.

 

Female Students 2019 Eighth Grade Mathematics

Georgia’s average Female Student Grade was a 56

The National average Female Student Grade was a 56

Percent of Georgia’s Female students scoring:

  • Below Basic with Grades of 0 to 52, was 32 percent
  • At Basic with Grades of 53 to 60, was 36 percent
  • At Proficient with Grades of 61 to 66, was 22 percent
  • At Advanced with Grades of 67 to 100, was 9 percent

Average Grade for Georgia’s Female Students scoring in:

  • The tenth percentile was a 46
  • The twenty-fifth percentile was a 51
  • The fiftieth percentile was a 56
  • The seventy-fifth percentile was a 61
  • The ninetieth percentile Grade was a 66

The assessment shows an estimated 91% plus of Georgia’s Female students were left behind academically based on NAEP’s Eighth Grade Mathematics assessment expectations for eighth-grade students.

 

Male Students 2019 Eighth Grade Mathematics

Georgia’s average Male Student Grade was a 56

The National average Male Student Grade was a 56

Percent of Georgia’s Male students scoring:

  • Below Basic with Grades of 0 to 52, was 33 percent
  • At Basic with Grades of 53 to 60, was 37 percent
  • At Proficient with Grades of 61 to 66, was 21 percent
  • at Advanced with Grades of 67 to 100, was 9 percent

Average Grade for Georgia’s Male Students scoring in:

  • The Tenth percentile was a 45
  • The Twenty-fifth percentile was a 50
  • The Fiftieth percentile was a 56
  • The seventy-fifth percentile was a 61
  • The ninetieth percentile Grade was a 66

The assessment shows an estimated 91% plus of Georgia’s Male students were left behind academically based on NAEP’s Eighth Grade Mathematics assessment expectations for eighth-grade students.

 

Hispanic Students 2019 Eighth Grade Mathematics

Georgia’s average Hispanic Student Grade was a 55

The National average Hispanic Student Grade was a 54

Percent of Georgia’s Hispanic students scoring:

  • Below Basic with Grades of 0 to 52, was 36 percent
  • At Basic with Grades of 53 to 60, was 39 percent
  • At Proficient with Grades of 61 to 66, was 19 percent
  • At Advanced with Grades of 67 to 100, was 6 percent

Average Grade for Georgia’s Hispanic Students scoring in:

  • The tenth percentile was a 46
  • The twenty-fifth percentile was a 50
  • The fiftieth percentile was a 55
  • The seventy-fifth percentile was a 60
  • The ninetieth percentile Grade was a 65

 The assessment shows an estimated 94% plus of Georgia’s Hispanic students were left behind academically based on NAEP’s Eighth Grade Mathematics assessment expectations for eighth-grade students.

 

Black Students 2019 Eighth Grade Mathematics

Georgia’s average Black Student Grade was a 52

The National average Black Student Grade was a 52

Percent of Georgia’s Black students scoring:

  • Below Basic with Grades of 0 to 52, was 50 percent
  • At Basic with Grades of 53 to 60, was 36 percent
  • At Proficient with Grades of 61 to 66, was 13 percent
  • At Advanced with Grades of 67 to 100, was 1 percent

Average Grade for Georgia’s Black Students scoring in:

  • The tenth percentile was a 44
  • The twenty-fifth percentile was a 48
  • The fiftieth percentile was a 52
  • The seventy-fifth percentile was a 57
  • The ninetieth percentile Grade was a 61

The assessment shows an estimated 99% plus of Georgia’s Black students were left behind academically based on NAEP’s Eighth Grade Mathematics assessment expectations for eighth-grade students.

 

The Academic GAP you are not used to seeing.

The academic gaps, as shown in Table 1, are based on measured academic performance.

TABLE 1: Grade 8 Mathematics, Academic Gaps, by National Assessment of Education Progress scale scores, and Grade Equivalents.

Ethnicity and Gender 0 to 500 Mean Scaled Scores Scale Score Difference from Asian Students 0 to 100        Grade Equivalents Grade Difference from Asian Students
Asian

324

65
White

292

32 58 6
Two or more races 283 41 57 8
Female 280 44 56 9
Georgia All students 279 45 56 9
Male 279 45 56 9
Hispanic 275 49 55 10
Black 262 62 52 12

* All scale scores and grade equivalents rounded to the nearest whole number.

** Due to rounding, differences may not appear exact. Examples: (1) a 64.8 would round to 65. (2) a 52.4 would round to 52. (3) a 12.4 would round to 12.

*** Rounding was the last function performed in the creation of Table 1: Grade 8 Mathematics, Academic Gaps, by National Assessment of Education Progress scale scores, and Grade Equivalents.

Table 1: shows the NAEP difference between Asian and Black student results as 62 scaled score points. However, when viewed as traditional grade values, the difference is 12 points.

 

OPINION

“While 62-scaled points and 12-grade points rounded, have the same weight, the presentation makes a difference when considering what needs to be done to catch up, move forward, or give up. Still, none of the total group averages are the equivalent of a 70 out of a possible 100 for a grade. What we have been doing for more than a half-century during the birth through high school graduation years has not been getting the job done for a supermajority of America’s students.”

 

The obligatory self-promotion:

As a startup, we are hoping you will find The Afterclap informative, different, and interesting. If you do, we would appreciate your following and sharing.

We are a work in progress, and our first goal is to show assessment results in a self-evident, understandable, and relatable way. We believe if the results were; self-evident, understandable, and relatable. Educational Authorities would not need to explain them to their satisfaction. Or for you to need The Afterclap to translate the Education Authorities explanation.

As a work in progress, if you have read any of our previous posts you will see how we are changing the format of the data, by streamlining the presentation. The goal is to show more facts in less space because your time is valuable. And we want you to know that your time here is a valuable use of that time.

As always, we welcome questions about the work and suggestions pertinent to accomplishing our goal.

 

You can find The Afterclap at:

Blog

Facebook

Or when we Twitter @TAfterclap

METHODOLOGY

All scaled scores and equivalent grades are rounded to the nearest whole number. Example: 248.87 would round to a 249. Except for scores showing exit and entry grades, which are adjusted up or down to a whole number to delineate performance levels. All percentages are rounded to the nearest whole number.

 

LINK AND LIST OF TABLES USED:

Part 1: https://theafterclap.com/2019/11/02/georgias-2019-naep-performance-as-grades-part-1-01-the-corrected-and-upgraded-edition/

Part 2: https://theafterclap.com/2019/11/22/georgias-2019-naep-ethnic-and-gender-fourth-grade-math-performance-as-grades-part-2/

NAEP Data Explorer https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/ndecore/xplore/NDE

Average scale scores and percentages at each achievement level for grade 8 mathematics, by race/ethnicity using 2011 guidelines, school-reported [SRACE10] and jurisdiction: 2019

Average scale scores and percentages at each achievement level for grade 8 mathematics, by gender [GENDER] and jurisdiction: 2019

Average scale scores and percentages at each achievement level for grade 8 mathematics, by all students [TOTAL] and jurisdiction: 2019

Average scale scores and percentile scores for grade 8 mathematics, by race/ethnicity using 2011 guidelines, school-reported [SRACE10] and jurisdiction: 2019

Average scale scores and percentile scores for grade 8 mathematics, by gender [GENDER] and jurisdiction: 2019

Average scale scores and percentile scores for grade 8 mathematics, by all students [TOTAL] and jurisdiction: 2019

 

Georgia’s 2019 NAEP Ethnic and Gender Fourth Grade Math Performance as Grades Part 2

This post is part two of five posts addressing Georgia’s 2019 NAEP assessments, follow the links for Part One, and Part Three.

In the datum below you will find:

> Scaled scores transcribed as grades rounded to the nearest whole number.  Example: a 48.87 would round to a 49.

> Scaled scores transcribed as grades as entry-and-exits for Below Basic, Basic, Proficient, and Advanced are rounded to the nearest whole number, or rounded for continuity. Example and entry-and-exit of “42.8 to 49.6” and “49.8 to 56.2” will be shown as “43 to 49” and “50 to 56,” as seen in the sections below.

> Percents are as reported on the National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP) and may not equal 100% due to rounding.

> Scaled scores transcribed as grades for academic gaps rounded to one decimal place.

 

Fourth Grade Mathematics by Race/Ethnicity using 2011 guidelines, as school-reported; and Gender

 

Asian Students 2019 Fourth Grade Mathematics

 

Georgia’s average Asian Student Grade was a 55

Georgia’s average Student Grade was a 48

National average Asian Student Grade was a 52

Percent of students scoring Below Basic with Grades of 0 to 42, was 2.04 percent

Percent of students scoring at Basic with Grades of 43 to 49, was 15.15 percent

Percent of students scoring at Proficient with Grades of 50 to 56, was 42.48 percent

Percent of students scoring at Advanced with Grades of 57 to 100, was 40.33 percent

Average Grade for Students scoring in the tenth percentile was a 48

Average Grade for Students scoring in the twenty-fifth percentile was a 51

Average Grade for Students scoring in the fiftieth percentile was a 55

Average Grade for Students scoring in the seventy-fifth percentile was a 58

Average Grade for Students scoring in the ninetieth percentile Grade was a 61

The assessment shows an estimated 59.67 percent-plus of Georgia’s Asian students were left behind academically based on NAEP’s Fourth Grade Mathematics assessment expectations for fourth-grade students.

 

Two or More Races Students 2019 Fourth Grade Mathematics

 

Georgia’s average Two or More Races Student Grade was a 50

Georgia’s average Student Grade was a 48

National average Two or More Races Student Grade was a 49

Percent of students scoring Below Basic with Grades of 0 to 42, was 10.73 percent

Percent of students scoring at Basic with Grades of 43 to 49, was 42.47 percent

Percent of students scoring at Proficient with Grades of 50 to 56, was 30.12 percent

Percent of students scoring at Advanced with Grades of 57 to 100, was 16.68 percent

Average Grade for Students scoring in the tenth percentile was a 42

Average Grade for Students scoring in the twenty-fifth percentile was a 46

Average Grade for Students scoring in the fiftieth percentile was a 49

Average Grade for Students scoring in the seventy-fifth percentile was a 54

Average Grade for Students scoring in the ninetieth percentile Grade was a 59

The assessment shows an estimated 83.32 percent-plus of Georgia’s Two or More Races students were left behind academically based on NAEP’s Fourth Grade Mathematics assessment expectations for fourth-grade students.

 

White Students 2019 Fourth Grade Mathematics

 

Georgia’s average White Student Grade was a 50

Georgia’s average Student Grade was a 48

National average White Student Grade was a 50

Percent of students scoring Below Basic with Grades of 0 to 42, was 10.38 percent

Percent of students scoring at Basic with Grades of 43 to 49, was 37.19 percent

Percent of students scoring at Proficient with Grades of 50 to 56, was 40.58 percent

Percent of students scoring at Advanced with Grades of 57 to 100, was 11.85 percent

Average Grade for Students scoring in the tenth percentile was a 43

Average Grade for Students scoring in the twenty-fifth percentile was a 46

Average Grade for Students scoring in the fiftieth percentile was a 50

Average Grade for Students scoring in the seventy-fifth percentile was a 54

Average Grade for Students scoring in the ninetieth percentile Grade was a 57

The assessment shows an estimated 88.15 percentplus of Georgia’s White students were left behind academically based on NAEP’s Fourth Grade Mathematics assessment expectations for fourth-grade students.

 

Male Students 2019 Fourth Grade Mathematics

 

Georgia’s average Male Student Grade was a 48

Georgia’s average Student Grade was a 48

National average Male Student Grade was a 48

Percent of students scoring Below Basic with Grades of 0 to 42, was 23.47 percent

Percent of students scoring at Basic with Grades of 43 to 49, was 39.28 percent

Percent of students scoring at Proficient with Grades of 50 to 56, was 28.17 percent

Percent of students scoring at Advanced with Grades of 57 to 100, was 9.08 percent

Average Grade for Students scoring in the tenth percentile was a 39

Average Grade for Students scoring in the twenty-fifth percentile was a 43

Average Grade for Students scoring in the fiftieth percentile was a 48

Average Grade for Students scoring in the seventy-fifth percentile was a 52

Average Grade for Students scoring in the ninetieth percentile Grade was a 56

The assessment shows an estimated 90.92 percent-plus of Georgia’s Male students were left behind academically based on NAEP’s Fourth Grade Mathematics assessment expectations for fourth-grade students.

 

Female Students 2019 Fourth Grade Mathematics

 

Georgia’s average Female Student Grade was a 48

Georgia’s average Student Grade was a 48

National average Female Student Grade was a 48

Percent of students scoring Below Basic with Grades of 0 to 42, was 22.03 percent

Percent of students scoring at Basic with Grades of 43 to 49, was 42.29 percent

Percent of students scoring at Proficient with Grades of 50 to 56, was 27.96 percent

Percent of students scoring at Advanced with Grades of 57 to 100, was 7.72 percent

Average Grade for Students scoring in the tenth percentile was a 39

Average Grade for Students scoring in the twenty-fifth percentile was a 43

Average Grade for Students scoring in the fiftieth percentile was a 48

Average Grade for Students scoring in the seventy-fifth percentile was a 52

Average Grade for Students scoring in the ninetieth percentile Grade was a 55

The assessment shows an estimated 92.28 percent-plus of Georgia’s Female students were left behind academically based on NAEP’s Fourth Grade Mathematics assessment expectations for fourth-grade students.

 

 

Hispanic Students 2019 Fourth Grade Mathematics

 

Georgia’s average Hispanic Student Grade was a 46

Georgia’s average Student Grade was a 48

National average Hispanic Student Grade was a 46

Percent of students scoring Below Basic with Grades of 0 to 42, was 26.12 percent

Percent of students scoring at Basic with Grades of 43 to 49, was 49.14 percent

Percent of students scoring at Proficient with Grades of 50 to 56, was 22.34 percent

Percent of students scoring at Advanced with Grades of 57 to 100, was 2.41 percent

Average Grade for Students scoring in the tenth percentile was a 38

Average Grade for Students scoring in the twenty-fifth percentile was a 43

Average Grade for Students scoring in the fiftieth percentile was a 46

Average Grade for Students scoring in the seventy-fifth percentile was a 50

Average Grade for Students scoring in the ninetieth percentile Grade was a 53

The assessment shows an estimated 97.6 percent-plus of Georgia’s Hispanic students were left behind academically based on NAEP’s Fourth Grade Mathematics assessment expectations for fourth-grade students.

 

Black Students 2019 Fourth Grade Mathematics

 

Georgia’s average Black Student Grade was a 45

Georgia’s average Student Grade was a 48

National average Black Student Grade was a 45

Percent of students scoring Below Basic with Grades of 0 to 42, was 36.9 percent

Percent of students scoring at Basic with Grades of 43 to 49, was 44.1 percent

Percent of students scoring at Proficient with Grades of 50 to 56, was 16.73 percent

Percent of students scoring at Advanced with Grades of 57 to 100, was 2.27 percent

Average Grade for Students scoring in the tenth percentile was a 37

Average Grade for Students scoring in the twenty-fifth percentile was a 41

Average Grade for Students scoring in the fiftieth percentile was a 45

Average Grade for Students scoring in the seventy-fifth percentile was a 49

Average Grade for Students scoring in the ninetieth percentile Grade was a 52

The assessment shows an estimated 97.73 percent-plus of Georgia’s Black students were left behind academically based on NAEP’s Fourth Grade Mathematics assessment expectations for fourth-grade students.

 

The Academic GAP you are not used to seeing.

 

The academic gaps, as shown in Table 1, are based on who leads academically, and the difference. Not based on an Education Authority story pitting one ethnic group against all others. If the Afterclap committed such an offense we would justifiably be charged with institutional racism and bigotry and would be guilty of the offense, because we know it to be a lie.

 

Table 1: Mathematics, Grade 4, Gaps by Ethnicity and Gender

Ethnicity and Gender Mean Scaled Scores Scale Score Difference from Asian Students Grade Equivalents Grade Points Difference from Asian Students
Asian 273 54.6
Two or more races 250 23 50 4.6
White 249 24 49.8 4.8
Male 238 35 47.6 7.0
Female 238 35 47.6 7.0
Georgia All students 238 35 47.6 7.0
Hispanic 230 43 46 8.6
Black 224 49 44.8 9.8

 

Congress has had oversight responsibilities of the National Assessment of Education Progress since 1978, with the enactment of Public Law 95–561 during the Jimmy Carter administration.

 

The obligatory self-promotion:

As a startup, we are hoping you will find The Afterclap informative, different, and interesting. If you do, we would appreciate your following and sharing.

We are a work in progress, and our first goal is to show assessment results in a self-evident, understandable, and relatable way. We believe if the results were; self-evident, understandable, and relatable. Educational Authorities would not need to explain them to their satisfaction. Or for you to need The Afterclap to translate the Education Authorities explanation.

We welcome questions about the work and suggestions pertinent to accomplishing our goal.

 

You can find The Afterclap at:

Blog

Facebook

Or when we Twitter @TAfterclap

 

LINKS USED:

NAEP Data Explorer https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/ndecore/xplore/NDE

https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/about/timeline.aspx

https://nces.ed.gov/transfer.asp?location=www.nagb.org/publications/95222.pdf

 

DATA TABLES USED:

Average scale scores and percentages at each achievement level for grade 4 mathematics, by race/ethnicity using 2011 guidelines, school-reported [SRACE10] and jurisdiction: 2019

Average scale scores and percentages at each achievement level for grade 4 mathematics, by gender [GENDER] and jurisdiction: 2019

Average scale scores and percentages at each achievement level for grade 4 mathematics, by all students [TOTAL] and jurisdiction: 2019

Average scale scores and percentile scores for grade 4 mathematics, by race/ethnicity using 2011 guidelines, school-reported [SRACE10] and jurisdiction: 2019

Georgia’s CCRPI, anchored to invented scales and fictional achievement levels.

Georgia’s CCRPI is currently anchored to the Georgia Department of Education (DOE) 2019 Milestones assessments descriptions of Continent Mastery, Progress, and Closing Achievement Gaps. The first three CCRPI items listed by the AJC article author Ty Tagami here, inspiring this post.

 

OPINION, I have to write an opinion because I get a little literary in my expressed disbelief. However, Grades are correct as rounded and adjusted for continuity and understanding. Example: Grades between levels of 71.2 and 71.3 would be adjusted to a 70 and 71 to show the exit and entry point between levels.

 

Let’s start with invented scales to describe student accomplishment.

 

The first part of the invented scales is the multiple scale score scaling systems used, instead of the 0 to 100 scale. And instead of listing all of them here we will list only Fourth and Eighth Grade scale range’s for English Language Arts (ELA), and Math in honor of Georgia’s 2019 NAEP accomplishments:

 

Fourth Grade ELA scale score range 210 to 775

Fourth Grade Mathematics scale score range 270 to 715

Eighth Grade ELA scale score range 225 to 730

Eighth Grade Mathematics scale score range 275 to 755

 

The second part of the invented scales is their explicitly described use in achievement levels. While the description of what was done by GA DOE was not provided for the Third through Eighth Grades, it was provided when fulfilling a Freedom of Information Request made to Georgia’s Department of Education for the high school assessments. Here I will use one example from all of the assessments.

 

The Ninth Grade Literature and Composition scale score range was 220 to 735. And students who received a scale score of 220 through 474 were Level one Beginning Learners. And if the scale score was a 474, according to GA DOE, that was equivalent to a grade of 67.

 

And if that were all you knew, then you would not know what was wrong.

 

The 220 is the real-world equivalent of 0.0. Also, in the real world, the 474 is only 49 percent of the scale range and the equivalent of a grade of a 49. The difference between the kind of math you and I use to pay our bills and balance our checkbooks would make the difference between the grade of 67 and the grade of 49 to be an 18 point grade inflation.

 

The grade inflation is the kind of gift that hides how many children were left behind last year. It also hides the massive level of failure to properly educate children to even the most basic level of mastery. And since I brought up mastery, let’s skip Developing Learners and look at both proficient and distinguished learners score ranges as grades.

 

Achievement Level 3: Proficient Learner scale score range as grades, 59 to  69

Achievement Level 4: Distinguished Learner scale score range as grades, 71 to 100

 

Of last year’s Georgia Ninth Grade Literature and Composition Class of 2022, based on the milestones published results, 83.3 percent of the students were left behind.

 

13.4 percent left behind with rounded Grades ranging from, 0 to 49

25.9 percent left behind with rounded Grades ranging from, 50 to 59

44.0 percent left behind with rounded Grades ranging from, 60 to 69

 

It is kind of hard to have significant progress when a supermajority of students are left behind every year. And since no effort is reported showing the students left behind were brought up to speed or recovered from their demonstrated lack of mastery, it is hard to believe that GA DOE wants to own up to it, which brings up Georgia’s performance on last year’s NAEP.

 

In Georgia’s 2019 NAEP All Students category for both English and Reading domains, and Grades an estimated 91% plus of the students assessed had been left behind and failed to score, a scaled score equivalent grade of 70. You can read a detailed breakdown here.

 

You can find The Afterclap at:

Blog

Facebook

Or when we Twitter @TAfterclap

 

Related:

Georgia’s 2019 NAEP Performance as Grades Part 1.01 The Corrected and Upgraded Edition

Related soon to be revised and republished to include how many students were left behind:

2019 Georgia Milestones Elementary Scores as Grades

2019 Georgia Milestones Middle School Scores as Grades

2019 Georgia Milestones High School Scores as Grades

 

LINKS AND SOURCES USED:

Why Georgia is looking at another overhaul of report card for schools, By Ty Tagami, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 2019 1101

[https://www.gadoe.org/External-Affairs-and-Policy/communications/Documents/Spring%202019%20EOG%20-%20State%20Level%20-%20All%20Grades.xlsx]

Georgia Milestones Assessment System End-of-Grade (EOG) Interpretive Guide for Score Reports for Spring and Summer 2019 For Use with Score Reports from Spring and Summer 2019 Administrations.Pdf

Spring 2019 EOC – State  [https://www.gadoe.org/External-Affairs-and-Policy/communications/Documents/Spring%202019%20EOC%20-%20State%20Level.xlsx]

2019 End-of-Grade EOC Interpretive Guide for Score Reports for Spring and Summer [https://www.gadoe.org/Curriculum-Instruction-and-Assessment/Assessment/Documents/Milestones/EOC-Resources/EOC_Score_Interpretation_Guide_2018-19.pdf]

NAEP Data Explorer https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/ndecore/xplore/NDE

Georgia’s 2019 NAEP Performance as Grades Part 1.01 The Corrected and Upgraded Edition

In the All Students category for both English and Reading domains, an estimated 91% plus of the students assessed had been left behind and failed to score, a scaled score equivalent grade of 70.

We apologize for the Fourth Grade Math typos. Despite hiding out on the internet we are human, but unlike the media, we don’t hide our mistakes on page six. We give you a splashy headline, and to make it worth your time, we are including percentage estimates of the students left behind.

In this post, Grades and percentages are rounded to the nearest whole number, or adjusted to show continuity when two grades or percentages would round to the same whole number. Percentages may exceed 100%.

This post is part one of five posts addressing Georgia’s 2019 NAEP assessments, follow links for Part Two, and Part Three

 

Fourth Grade Students Mathematics scores as Grades:

Georgia’s average Student Grade was a 48

Percent of students scoring Below Basic with Grades of 0 to 42 was 23 percent

Percent of students scoring at Basic with Grades of 43 to 49, was 41 percent

Percent of students scoring at Proficient with Grades of 50 to 56, was 28 percent

Percent of students scoring at Advanced with Grades of 57 to 100, was 9 percent

Average Grade for Students scoring in the tenth percentile was a 40

Average Grade for Students scoring in the twenty-fifth percentile was a 43

Average Grade for Students scoring in the fiftieth percentile was a 48

Average Grade for Students scoring in the seventy-fifth percentile was a 52

Average Grade for Students scoring in the ninetieth percentile Grade was a 56

The assessment shows an estimated 91% plus of Georgia’s students have been left behind academically in Fourth Grade Mathematics.

 

Eighth Grade Students Mathematics scores as Grades:

Georgia’s average Student Grade was a 57

Percent of students scoring Below Basic with Grades of  0 to 52, was 33 percent

Percent of students scoring at Basic with Grades of 53 to 59, was 36 percent

Percent of students scoring at Proficient with Grades of 60 to 66, was 22 percent

Percent of students scoring at Advanced with Grades of 67 to 100, was 9 percent

Average Grade for Students scoring in the tenth percentile was a 46

Average Grade for Students scoring in the twenty-fifth percentile was a 51

Average Grade for Students scoring in the fiftieth percentile was a 56

Average Grade for Students scoring in the seventy-fifth percentile was a 61

Average Grade for Students scoring in the ninetieth percentile Grade was a 66

The assessment shows an estimated 91 % plus of Georgia’s students have been left behind academically in Eighth Grade Mathematics.

 

Fourth Grade Students Reading scores as Grades:

Georgia’s average Student Grade was a 44

Percent of students scoring Below Basic with Grades of 0 to 41, was 37 percent

Percent of students scoring at Basic with Grades of 42 to 47, was 31 percent

Percent of students scoring at Proficient with Grades of 48 to 53, was 23 percent

Percent of students scoring at Advanced with Grades of 54 to 100, was 9 percent

Average Grade for Students scoring in the tenth percentile was a 33

Average Grade for Students scoring in the twenty-fifth percentile was a 39

Average Grade for Students scoring in the fiftieth percentile was a 44

Average Grade for Students scoring in the seventy-fifth percentile was a 49

Average Grade for Students scoring in the ninetieth percentile Grade was a 53

The assessment shows an estimated 91% plus of Georgia’s students have been left behind academically in Fourth Grade Reading.

 

Eighth Grade Students Reading scores as Grades:

Georgia’s average Student Grade was a 52

Percent of students scoring Below Basic with Grades of 0 to 48, was 28 percent

Percent of students scoring at Basic with Grades of 49 to 56, was 40 percent

Percent of students scoring at Proficient with Grades of 57 to 64, was 29 percent

Percent of students scoring at Advanced with Grades of  65 to 100, was 4 percent

Average Grade for Students scoring in the tenth percentile was a 43

Average Grade for Students scoring in the twenty-fifth percentile was a 48

Average Grade for Students scoring in the fiftieth percentile was a 53

Average Grade for Students scoring in the seventy-fifth percentile was a 58

Average Grade for Students scoring in the ninetieth percentile Grade was a 61

The assessment shows an estimated 96% plus of Georgia’s students have been left behind academically in Eighth Grade Reading.

 

The obligatory self-promotion:

As a startup, we are hoping you will find The Afterclap informative, different, and interesting. If you do, we would appreciate your following and sharing.

We are a work in progress, and our first goal is to show assessment results in a self-evident, understandable, and relatable way. We believe if the results were; self-evident, understandable, and relatable. Educational Authorities would not need to explain them to their satisfaction. Or for you to need The Afterclap to translate the Education Authorities explanation.

We welcome questions about the work and suggestions pertinent to accomplishing our goal.

 

Related:

Georgia Scores an F on 2019 SAT

2019 Georgia Milestones Elementary Scores as Grades

2019 Georgia Milestones Middle School Scores as Grades

2019 Georgia Milestones High School Scores as Grades

 

You can find The Afterclap at:

Blog

Facebook

Or when we Twitter @TAfterclap

 

LINK AND SOURCE USED:

NAEP Data Explorer https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/ndecore/xplore/NDE

Georgia’s 2019 NAEP Performance as Grades Part 1

This post is not the news or a regurgitation of a press release. It is the NAEP results as Grades. And you will not be told what to think or believe about them. Do you have the courage to continue reading?

In this post, Grades and percentages are rounded to the nearest whole number, or adjusted to show continuity when two grades or percentages would round to the same whole number. Percentages may exceed 100%.

 

Fourth Grade Students Mathematics scores as Grades:

Georgia’s average Student Grade was a 48

Percent of students scoring Below Basic with Grades of 0 to 42 was 41 percent

Percent of students scoring at Basic with Grades of 43 to 48, was 42 percent

Percent of students scoring at Proficient with Grades of 49 to 56, was 48 percent

Percent of students scoring at Advanced with Grades of 57 to 100, was 54 percent

Average Grade for Students scoring in the tenth percentile was a 40

Average Grade for Students scoring in the twenty-fifth percentile was a 43

Average Grade for Students scoring in the fiftieth percentile was a 48

Average Grade for Students scoring in the seventy-fifth percentile was a 52

Average Grade for Students scoring in the ninetieth percentile Grade was a 56

 

Eighth Grade Students Mathematics scores as Grades:

Georgia’s average Student Grade was a 57

Percent of students scoring Below Basic with Grades of  0 to 52, was 33 percent

Percent of students scoring at Basic with Grades of 53 to 59, was 36 percent

Percent of students scoring at Proficient with Grades of 60 to 66, was 22 percent

Percent of students scoring at Advanced with Grades of 67 to 100, was 9 percent

Average Grade for Students scoring in the tenth percentile was a 46

Average Grade for Students scoring in the twenty-fifth percentile was a 51

Average Grade for Students scoring in the fiftieth percentile was a 56

Average Grade for Students scoring in the seventy-fifth percentile was a 61

Average Grade for Students scoring in the ninetieth percentile Grade was a 66

 

Fourth Grade Students Reading scores as Grades:

Georgia’s average Student Grade was a 44

Percent of students scoring Below Basic with Grades of 0 to 41, was 37 percent

Percent of students scoring at Basic with Grades of 42 to 47, was 31 percent

Percent of students scoring at Proficient with Grades of 48 to 53, was 23 percent

Percent of students scoring at Advanced with Grades of 54 to 100, was 9 percent

Average Grade for Students scoring in the tenth percentile was a 33

Average Grade for Students scoring in the twenty-fifth percentile was a 39

Average Grade for Students scoring in the fiftieth percentile was a 44

Average Grade for Students scoring in the seventy-fifth percentile was a 49

Average Grade for Students scoring in the ninetieth percentile Grade was a 53

 

Eighth Grade Students Reading scores as Grades:

Georgia’s average Student Grade was a 52

Percent of students scoring Below Basic with Grades of 0 to 48, was 28 percent

Percent of students scoring at Basic with Grades of 49 to 56, was 40 percent

Percent of students scoring at Proficient with Grades of 57 to 64, was 29 percent

Percent of students scoring at Advanced with Grades of  65 to 100, was 4 percent

Average Grade for Students scoring in the tenth percentile was a 43

Average Grade for Students scoring in the twenty-fifth percentile was a 48

Average Grade for Students scoring in the fiftieth percentile was a 53

Average Grade for Students scoring in the seventy-fifth percentile was a 58

Average Grade for Students scoring in the ninetieth percentile Grade was a 61

 

The obligatory self-promotion:

As a startup, we are hoping you will find The Afterclap informative, different, and interesting. If you do, we would appreciate your following and sharing.

We are a work in progress, and our first goal is to show assessment results in a self-evident, understandable, and relatable way. We believe if the results were; self-evident, understandable, and relatable. Educational Authorities would not need to explain them to their satisfaction. Or for you to need The Afterclap to translate the Education Authorities explanation.

We welcome questions about the work and suggestions pertinent to accomplishing our goal.

 

Related:

Georgia Scores an F on 2019 SAT

2019 Georgia Milestones Elementary Scores as Grades

2019 Georgia Milestones Middle School Scores as Grades

2019 Georgia Milestones High School Scores as Grades

 

You can find The Afterclap at:

Blog

Facebook

Or when we Twitter @TAfterclap

 

LINK AND SOURCE USED:

NAEP Data Explorer https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/ndecore/xplore/NDE